Seaboard Corporation

The company does not disclose undertaking an assessment. The company does not identify processing facilities that operate in locations with high and medium water stress, from a quality perspective.

The company does not disclose wastewater quality metrics for any of the wastewater it discharges. The company does not disclose the number of incidences of non-compliance with water quality permits, standards, and regulations.

The company does not mention 'biodiversity' or 'water quality' within its annual report or sustainability highlights.

The company does not disclose undertaking a formal risk assessment of nutrient pollution risk around farms. It discloses that it undertakes farm mapping surveys utilising internal and external resources to identify environmental threats that exist in neighbouring fields, however this seems to be in the context of spreading effluents. Feed is not discussed as part of the company's assessment of its exposure to areas of medium or high water risk or biodiversity risk.

The company discloses that it applies effluent to neighbouring crop fields, but it is unclear if any crops are used in the company's feed supply.

The company mentions that changing laws and regulations are a risk to the business. However, it does not refer to changing nutrient/pollution regulation explicitly.

The company states that it follows local and state environmental laws to maintain levels of our lagoons and apply the effluent to neighbouring crop fields. However, no further detail is provided, and it is not clear on the level of monitoring the company undertakes of its livestock suppliers. The company does not disclose the number of incidences of non-compliance with water quality permits, standards, and regulations.

Seaboard does not disclose the volume of wastewater it produces. It states that effluent from lagoons is applied to neighbouring fields. It also states that it uses 'multiple systems to handle and process biological waste in a safe and efficient manner' but does not provide more detail. The company states that it provided 1.5 million lb of Nitrogen fertiliser to local farmers. However, it is unclear the company does not detail treatment methods. The company states that it is constructing renewable natural gas sites with its integrated model of hog operations, covered anaerobic digester lagoons and biomethane upgrading facilities at certain of its existing hog farms in Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas, with a few sites complete and in early stages of operations. The company produced biodiesel at facilities in Oklahoma and Missouri, and renewable diesel at a facility in Kansas. Seaboard discloses that these are both produced from pork fat supplied by the pork processing plants and other animal fats and vegetable oils purchased from third parties. It is not clear from the company's disclosure if it supports contracted farmers in biogas capture, or if the investments described above are only made to owned operations.

The company does not disclose that it identifies areas of high or medium water risk. Nor does it disclose site specific plans for nutrient management.

The company undertakes farm mapping to understand the environmental pressures of neighbouring fields before the application of effluents and manure. Seaboard states that it partners with local farmers to provide natural fertiliser and organic matter for their crop fields. However, it is unclear what processes are in place to support farmers.

The company does not disclose information on pilots or research into circular solutions to waste other than biogas recovery.

The company does not disclose information.

The company does not disclose information.

The company did not engage with the investor signatories.