Guangdong Haid Group Co., Limited

The company does not have a science-based emission reduction target.

The company has not disclosed specific targets for reducing Scope 1, Scope 2, or Scope 3 GHG emissions.

The company does not discuss whether it is working with suppliers to reduce emissions from agriculture.

The company does not engage in innovative projects to reduce or mitigate emissions from feed farming.

The company utilises various technologies, such as boiler energy-saving technologies, air energy equipment, and waste heat recovery systems, to reduce Scope 1 emissions. However, it is unclear if these initiatives are being implemented company-wide. Additionally, it addresses electricity consumption through solar panels, purchasing green electricity, and reusing fermented biogas from farm manure as fuel, though these measures are not deemed innovative.

The company does not disclose its GHG emissions inventory.

The company does not disclose any information on GHG emissions from animal farming. The company does not disclose any information on GHG emissions from feed production. The company does not disclose any information on GHG emissions from land use change.

The company does not disclose to the CDP climate change questionnaire. The company does not disclose whether the GHG inventory data is audited by a third party.

The company does not disclose any information on its emission performance. The company does not disclose a quantitative decrease in emissions arising from feed, enteric fermentation, or manure management.

The company does not disclose information on a climate-related scenario analysis.

The company acknowledges physical climate risks, such as extreme temperatures, storms, and typhoons, which may affect feed availability. To address these challenges, it employs two primary strategies. Firstly, it focuses on regional distribution expansion by extending its network of manufacturers and local markets in key operational areas. This diversification seeks to minimise the impact of weather-related anomalies and natural disasters. Secondly, it supports farmers through integrated solutions in feed, seedlings, and animal healthcare, offering scientific breeding plans and personalised services from technical staff to enhance resilience and competitiveness against unusual weather conditions. The company recognises that extreme weather changes can impact breeding production, livestock inventory, and aquatic products, and rising water temperatures could lead to higher mortality rates, affecting short-term feed demand. Despite offering a range of products, including biological items, veterinary medicine, and vaccines, the company does not disclose costs associated with veterinary services and medicine related to climate change. Additionally, it does not address increased energy costs or discuss the risks of a carbon tax on electricity and/or animal protein. Moreover, the company fails to disclose the number of financially material events resulting from climate risk during the reporting period.

The company does not disclose its commitment to align capital expenditures with its GHG targets.

The company sources soy for animal feed but does not disclose the percentage of feed ingredients this represents. 100% of soy is not sourced from deforestation-free areas or suppliers. The company has not undertaken a deforestation-related risk assessment to identify high-risk sourcing locations.

The company does not disclose having a deforestation/conversion-free target for soy.

The company does not report progress against its commitment. Nor did it respond to the CDP Forest Questionnaire in 2022.

The company promotes and ensures the traceability of soybeans among its suppliers. However, it does not address deforestation in its supplier code of conduct and lacks detail on how it supports achieving traceability.

The company does not disclose how compliance is monitored or what actions are taken if non-compliance occurs. Furthermore, the company does not disclose the level of traceability in its soy supply chain.

The company is working to reduce its reliance on soy as a feed ingredient.

The company does not disclose whether any of its farms hold relevant certifications.

The company does not disclose feed ingredients by percentage, nor does it state if it purchases certified soy and marine animal products. The company does not provide disclosure on forage fish dependency for fish meal and fish oil.

The company does not disclose information about the sourcing of fishmeal and fish oil used in its feed basket, nor does it specify whether marine and soy ingredients are 100% certified. Furthermore, the company does not provide information on improvements in feed conversion efficiency or its reliance on foraged fish during the reporting period.

The company does not disclose having conducted a risk assessment on how reduced feed availability might impact production. It also lacks a disclosed strategy to increase the use of seafood trimmings or alternative feed ingredients.

The company does not disclose the percentage of R&D allocated to novel ingredient development. Furthermore, it does not disclose a target related to feed innovation. It also does not disclose the average EPA and DHA content of salmon it produces.

The company does not disclose data on escapes, nor does it disclose the financial cost of all escape events or provide a discussion on escapement prevention. Finally, the company does not disclose a time-bound target for zero escapes.

The company does not provide a discussion of work undertaken to reduce biodiversity impacts. It also does not provide a time-bound target to eliminate human-wildlife conflict.

The company does not disclose a management plan in the event of algal blooms.

The company recognises water scarcity as a growing global concern, categorising its water resource risk exposure as 'low' in feed production, 'middle' in pig farming, and 'high' in aquatic seed. Management analyses water risk levels across major business segments, identifies risk points, and formulates targeted improvement strategies to mitigate the impact on local water resources and the environment. The company addresses water scarcity by implementing water-saving measures, such as recycling water in feed production through a wastewater treatment system and establishing a closed-loop water circulation system for breeding. However, it is unclear if a risk assessment has been conducted for processing facilities in water-stressed areas, and the company does not disclose its water consumption.

The company does not disclose a time-bound water reduction target to reduce total water withdrawals at facilities in the reporting year.

The company does not report water withdrawals or consumption by source or by water stress level. It does not disclose water-related CAPEX or OPEX, nor did it respond to the CDP Water Questionnaire.

The company does not address water usage in its feed supply chain. It does not discuss comprehensive guidance, support, or incentives offered to suppliers/growers on water usage and has not established a partnership with a third party to input into sourcing/farming strategy.

The company does not disclose feed water intensity or the proportion of feed sourced from water-stressed areas. Furthermore, the company does not provide evidence that it is investing in sustainable feed production from a water-use perspective.

The company has implemented high-efficiency drinking fountains and optimised sewage treatment processes to mitigate water risk in animal farming, claiming significant water savings. However, it has not published a sustainable agriculture policy addressing water use in animal farming. The company also does not disclose the proportion of animal protein commodities produced or sourced in water-stressed areas, nor does it provide guidance, support, or incentives to suppliers or growers on water use in animal farming.

The company does not disclose having established partnerships with third parties to input into sourcing/farming strategy, including water use.

The company does not identify facilities that operate in locations with high and medium water stress from a quality perspective. It has not set a quality or volume target for wastewater, nor does it report the number of instances of non-compliance with water quality permits, standards, and regulations.

The company discloses water quality data for only seven of its 557 operating units, limiting its geographic scope. It does not disclose wastewater discharge volumes or provide audit information. Additionally, the company has not responded to the CDP Water Questionnaire for 2023.

The company converts faeces and organic matter into high-quality organic fertilisers using a closed composting reactor, which efficiently ferments and stabilises materials while controlling odours. These fertilisers, compliant with national standards, are supplied to large-scale growers for crops such as sugarcane and vegetables, which then support livestock feed. However, it is unclear if processing by-products are also utilised for this purpose. The company has reported wastewater quantities for five subsidiaries, noting inconsistencies in pollutant levels, with some increasing and others decreasing from 2022. The geographic scope is specified but limited to certain regions. The company has not reduced the overall volume of wastewater discharged compared to the previous reporting period.

The company does not address nutrient management in its code of conduct. It does not disclose a requirement for feed suppliers to have a nutrient management plan in place, nor does it provide guidance, support, or incentives to suppliers/growers on nutrient management or fertiliser use in crop production.

The company does not invest in sustainable feed production to improve nutrient management or disclose information about pesticide use in its feed supply chain.

The company has implemented a livestock manure treatment system to convert manure into fertilisers. However, it does not conduct risk assessments to identify high-risk locations.

The company does not make site-specific nutrient management plans part of its supplier’s contractual agreement or its own farms management. Nor does it provide technical or financial support to suppliers or its own farms to develop nutrient management plans and improve manure storage.

The company does not integrate nutrient management performance into incentive schemes for farmers. It does not discuss innovations in manure or provide evidence of a community engagement plan in relation to pollution.

The company does not disclose whether it undertakes risk assessments to identify farming locations at high risk of nutrient pollution. Additionally, it does not provide metrics or methods used to measure organic and inorganic loading at these sites, nor does it outline a strategy to prevent the accumulation of organic matter.

The company does not disclose the treatment or metrics of effluent pond water. It does not disclose a neutral impact on water or provide evidence of a community engagement plan.

The company outlines general initiatives to reduce antibiotic reliance, such as improving animal welfare and developing vaccines, but lacks detailed measures for its major production segments, pork and poultry. Although it mentions over 100 nutritional experiments in aquaculture and highlights general animal welfare areas, it does not specify actions directly aimed at reducing antibiotic usage. Additionally, the company lacks a formal antibiotics policy and does not offer antibiotic-free brands.

The company does not disclose the quantity of antibiotics used.

The company aims to provide a comfortable environment for welfare farming by addressing animals' natural needs and ensuring access to food, water and space, while avoiding physical and mental suffering. However, it lacks specific details on implementing these measures across its operations. The company does not reference the Five Freedoms or provide an equivalent framework applicable to all livestock categories, nor does it state a commitment to engaging and training employees on animal welfare issues. Furthermore, the company does not outline actions taken in the event of a breach in its animal welfare policy and lacks details on leadership involvement in research and development to advance animal welfare.

The company does not state a commitment to engaging and training employees on animal welfare issues.

The company does not disclose information on animal welfare certifications or farm assurance programs.

The company does not disclose information on animal welfare certifications or assurance programs for its beef operations.

The company does not disclose information on key animal welfare risks in beef.

The company recognises the importance of animal welfare, highlighting health monitoring and safe environments. However, it offers limited detail on specific actions concerning thermal and physical comfort, pain monitoring, and the reduction of fear and stress, particularly in aquaculture. Furthermore, the company does not disclose its handling protocols or the use of higher welfare stunning techniques.

The company does not disclose sufficient information to ascertain if it ensures a stocking density of lower than 17 kg/m³ for salmon at all times.

The company does not disclose information regarding eye-stalk ablation of shrimp.

The company does not disclose mortality rates or incident-based mortality information and has not set a time-bound target for reducing mortality rates.

The company does not disclose incident-based mortality.

The company does not disclose the mortality rate for shrimp.

The company does not disclose data on disease outbreaks or biomass lost to such outbreaks over the past three years. It employs an 11-step water filtration process in its shrimp farming, ensuring a controlled and safe environment, and allows for recycling over 90% of the water used. However, the company does not provide details on the use of pond liners across its operations.

The company claims to comply with national laws and internationally recognised human rights policies but does not specify which international policies it follows.

The company does not discuss how it monitors, assesses, and mitigates actual and potential human rights risks in its operations or supply chain.

The company does not disclose whether it has identified any human rights risks in its operations through human rights due diligence.

The company states that it prohibits child labour, forced labour, and discrimination in its operations and provides a fixed salary with market competitiveness. However, the company does not disclose a clear commitment to offer living wage or sick pay. The company sources fishmeal from suppliers adhering to the International Fishmeal and Fish Oil Organisation Responsible Supply standards, covering non-discrimination, humane treatment, prohibition of forced labour, fair wages, and child labour. It is unclear whether the company requires other suppliers, such as those providing corn and soy, to comply with similar policies.

The company has implemented a whistleblowing channel accessible to both internal and external stakeholders. However, it does not disclose the number of grievances reported through these channels, nor does it monitor compliance with selected supply chain policies via audits.

The company is dedicated to ensuring a safe workplace and targets zero accidents, injuries, and losses. It has set up a safety and environmental protection committee to oversee these efforts and create safety guidelines and strategies. However, it does not disclose whether it holds any recognised certifications for health and safety, nor does it clarify how many of its facilities have their own health and safety committees with worker representatives. Additionally, the company does not disclose any assessment of the antimicrobial resistance risk for its workforce.

The company does not disclose injury or fatality data for the current reporting or previous year. Nor does the company disclose turnover rates for the reporting period.

The company is based in China, where freedom of association is not legally permitted. It does not describe any measures taken to support rights, nor does it have a publicly available supplier code of conduct.

The company does not disclose the distribution of its workforce according to contract type, nor does it state the number of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements or provide a statement supporting its employees' right to bargain collectively.

The company does not disclose whether it has food safety certifications in place, or whether it requires suppliers to have GFSI certifications.

The company does not report the number or frequency of food safety audits conducted during the reporting year. It also does not specify associated corrective action rates, nor does it disclose whether it has implemented or is in the process of developing consumer-facing technology for food safety.

The company does not acknowledge food safety as a material business issue, nor does it disclose that a product recall system is in place. It does not report any data on product recall incidents in the reporting year. Furthermore, it does not provide information on preventive or corrective actions.

The company does not disclose information on market bans, including their number and locations, for the reporting year. Additionally, there were no recalls or market bans detected in media sources.

The company states that the Board of Directors reviews its sustainable development strategy and promotes related initiatives. It identifies key ESG issues affecting stakeholders and influencing its sustainable development, which have changed from the previous year. These issues include compliance with laws, value for farmers, food safety, employee well-being, emissions reduction, and resource loss. However, the company does not specify whether the board is involved in the assessment. One Board member, Xueqiao Qian, is involved in research projects related to feed innovation and aquatic animal nutrition, overseeing technology research and development, as well as the animal healthcare business. The company does not disclose any board members with expertise in sustainability or food safety.

The company does not disclose executive monetary remuneration linked to climate or sustainability performance. Nor has it disclosed engaging with civil or trade associations on ESG issues, providing a comprehensive list of trade association memberships, or aligning any policy engagement activities with the goal of restricting global temperature rise to 1.5°C.

The company does not disclose a strategic approach to sustainability innovation or state whether it benchmarks itself against peers in sustainability and innovation.

The company does not explicitly acknowledge that protein diversification is a material business issue. Furthermore, it has not yet set a time-bound target to diversify protein sources, nor does it report revenue or sales linked to alternative protein sources.

The company does not indicate an approach to diversifying its product range to include plant-based and alternative protein options.