Beijing Sanyuan Foods Co Ltd

The company does not have a science-based emission reduction target or methane-specific emission reduction target.

The company supports China's "dual carbon" strategy by promoting energy conservation and green development. It has implemented energy-saving measures, such as reducing warehouse lighting, upgrading equipment, and expanding solar power projects, achieving a total photovoltaic capacity of 12,700 kW across four factories. However, the company does not disclose targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from Scope 1 and Scope 2. Additionally, while emissions from raw milk suppliers are included in Scope 3, the company has not set any emissions targets for Scope 3.

The company does not discuss whether it is working with suppliers to reduce emissions from agriculture.

The company does not engage in innovative projects to reduce or mitigate emissions from feed farming.

The company does not engage in innovative projects to reduce or mitigate emissions from animal farming.

The company does not disclose its GHG emissions inventory.

The company does not disclose any information on GHG emissions from animal farming. The company does not disclose any information on GHG emissions from feed production. The company does not disclose any information on GHG emissions from land use change.

The company does not disclose to the CDP climate change questionnaire. The company does not disclose whether the GHG inventory data is audited by a third party.

The company does not disclose any information on its emission performance. The company does not disclose a quantitative decrease in emissions arising from feed, enteric fermentation, or manure management.

The company does not disclose information on a climate-related scenario analysis.

The company does not provide details on the assessment or mitigation of factors posing a material risk to protein production, including feed availability, heat stress, increased medicine and energy costs, and carbon taxes. Additionally, the company does not disclose the number of financially material events related to climate risk during the reporting period.

The company does not disclose its commitment to align capital expenditures with its GHG targets.

The company sources soy for animal feed but does not disclose the percentage of feed ingredients this represents. 100% of soy is not sourced from deforestation-free areas or suppliers. The company has not undertaken a deforestation-related risk assessment to identify high-risk sourcing locations.

The company does not disclose having a deforestation/conversion-free target for soy.

The company does not report progress against its commitment. Nor did it respond to the CDP Forest Questionnaire in 2022.

The company does not disclose any information on how it engages soy suppliers on deforestation and does not provide support to soy producers to encourage deforestation-free production or improve traceability.

The company does not disclose how compliance is monitored or what actions are taken if non-compliance occurs. Furthermore, the company does not disclose the level of traceability in its soy supply chain.

The company does not discuss innovations or practices to move towards sustainable feed sources.

The company does not address water usage in its feed supply chain. It does not discuss comprehensive guidance, support, or incentives offered to suppliers/growers on water usage and has not established a partnership with a third party to input into sourcing/farming strategy.

The company does not disclose feed water intensity or the proportion of feed sourced from water-stressed areas. Furthermore, the company does not provide evidence that it is investing in sustainable feed production from a water-use perspective.

The company does not disclose the proportion of animal protein commodities produced or sourced in water-stressed areas. It does not disclose information addressing water scarcity in its animal supply chain, nor does it discuss guidance it offers to animal farmers/suppliers on water usage.

The company does not disclose having established partnerships with third parties to input into sourcing/farming strategy, including water use.

The company does not address nutrient management in its code of conduct. It does not disclose a requirement for feed suppliers to have a nutrient management plan in place, nor does it provide guidance, support, or incentives to suppliers/growers on nutrient management or fertiliser use in crop production.

The company does not invest in sustainable feed production to improve nutrient management or disclose information about pesticide use in its feed supply chain.

The company does not outline processes for manure management, conversion to biogas, or sustainable slurry application. Additionally, it has not specifically identified farms located in areas at high risk of nutrient pollution.

The company does not make site-specific nutrient management plans part of its supplier’s contractual agreement or its own farms management. Nor does it provide technical or financial support to suppliers or its own farms to develop nutrient management plans and improve manure storage.

The company does not integrate nutrient management performance into incentive schemes for farmers. It does not discuss innovations in manure or provide evidence of a community engagement plan in relation to pollution.

The company acknowledges the significance of controlling veterinary drugs as part of its food safety commitments. It employs a standardised system to manage drug inventories, which involves reviews and usage restrictions. Farms are required to maintain detailed records, and regular inspections help prevent misuse. However, there is no formal policy specifying conditions for antibiotic use. The company has implemented initiatives to enhance animal welfare and reduce antibiotic usage, centred around the EDTM dairy farming technology system. This system includes environmental control, digital management of dairy cow production, and total mixed ration nutrition to ensure a comfortable environment for the cows. Seasonal adjustments, such as providing warm water in winter and cooling facilities like sprinklers, awnings, and fans in summer, help mitigate heat stress. Automatic brushing machines also alleviate skin irritation and improve circulation, contributing to better health and lower disease rates.

The company maintains records of veterinary drug usage but does not publicly disclose this information. It does not provide details on antibiotic quantities by type or class, nor does it explain the reasons for antibiotic use during the reporting period. Additionally, the company does not report any reduction in the percentage of animals treated with antibiotics or quantity per ton of product compared to the previous reporting period. It also does not disclose whether the antibiotic usage data is audited by a third party.

The company does not provide a statement in support of the Five Freedoms or a similar statement on the importance of animal welfare.

The company lacks explicit commitments regarding the avoidance of close confinement, routine mutilation, long-distance transportation, and humane slaughter. Furthermore, it does not commit to excluding breeds with production traits that increase anatomical or metabolic disorders. However, the company has implemented measures for dairy cattle welfare, including providing warm drinking water in winter, and cooling facilities such as sprinklers and fans in summer. Additionally, brushing machines relieve skin irritation, and there is adequate shading to protect against extreme weather.

In 2023, nine of the company's dairy farms achieved Level 1 China Good Agricultural Practices Certification (ChinaGAP). This certification aligns with Global Good Agricultural Practice (G.A.P.) Integrated Farm Assurance standards. Additionally, two of its dairy suppliers have obtained organic certifications.

The company does not disclose information on animal welfare certifications or assurance programs for its beef operations.

The company does not disclose information on key animal welfare risks in beef.

The company claims adherence to Chinese labour laws and international human rights standards, but it does not specify which international standards it follows.

The company does not discuss how it monitors, assesses, and mitigates actual and potential human rights risks in its operations or supply chain.

The company does not disclose whether it has identified any human rights risks in its operations through human rights due diligence.

The company states it prohibits discrimination, child labour, and forced labour, but does not address the prohibition of abuse or inhumane treatment. It conducts audits on products, employees, consumers, the company, business cooperation, and social responsibility, yet it is unclear if these audits cover the stated policies. The company does not disclose policies on fair working conditions for its suppliers. It mentions protecting employees' rights to rest and vacation but does not provide information on sick pay.

The company does not discuss whether it has conducted supplier audits covering human rights or if it has a grievance reporting mechanism open to employees or external stakeholders.

The company reports that 87.5% of its sites hold ISO 45001 certification and it regularly audits and reviews its safety management system. It conducts special physical examinations for employees in hazardous areas and adjusts positions based on health assessments. A safety production management committee oversees employee health and safety. However, the company does not disclose the percentage of facilities with site-specific health and safety committees with worker representatives, nor does it address antimicrobial resistance risk for its workforce.

The company reports an occupational injury rate of 1.27 per million man-hours worked for FY2023 and states there were no serious injuries or fatalities during this period. However, it does not disclose injury or fatality data for previous years, preventing any assessment of improvement or comparison over time. Additionally, the company does not disclose the turnover rate for the reporting year.

The company operates solely in China, where freedom of association is legally prohibited. While it discloses initiatives to support worker representation, such as holding worker congresses and meetings with employee representatives, there is no clear evidence of support for employees' rights to collective bargaining. Additionally, the company does not have a publicly accessible supplier code of conduct that addresses freedom of association and collective bargaining.

The company does not disclose the distribution of its workforce according to contract type, nor does it state the number of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements or provide a statement supporting its employees' right to bargain collectively.

The company has successfully renewed its ISO 9001 and FSSC 22000 certifications, recognised by the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI). However, it does not disclose the proportion of GFSI-certified sites. It maintains strict supplier product quality standards, requiring suppliers to hold valid ISO 9001, FSSC 22000, or BRC certifications. Currently, 89 suppliers, approximately 35% of its total (254), are FSSC 22000 certified.

The company has conducted comprehensive food safety risk audits, yielding excellent results. All 830 cases of raw milk tested for pesticide residues, veterinary drug residues, heavy metals, and other contaminants, passed with a 100% success rate. Similarly, 416 cases of finished products passed testing for microorganisms, pollutants, and plasticizers. Additionally, 66,017 batches of finished products were inspected, all meeting quality standards with a 100% qualification rate. The company inspected 56 factories, reporting no major non-conformities but did not disclose minor non-conformities. A detailed overview of the company's food traceability systems is provided, highlighting the Sanyuan Quality Traceability Tour event organised with People's Daily New Media. However, the traceability system is not consumer-focused, and no specific consumer-facing food safety technologies are mentioned.

The company identifies food safety as a material business risk, addressing it through daily inspections, weekly risk reviews, and monthly management planning. In 2023, it plans to enhance safety via comprehensive risk assessments across the dairy supply chain and continual updates to its quality management systems. However, the company does not regard product recalls or bans as material risks and provides no details on its recall system, nor does it disclose the number of recalls in the reporting year.

The company does not disclose information on market bans or recalls, including their number and locations, for the reporting year. Additionally, no such incidents were identified through media screening.

The company has implemented a comprehensive compliance management framework focusing on products, employees, consumers, company, business cooperation, and social responsibility, with oversight by the Board of Directors. However, it is not clear if the Board's responsibilities extend to ESG issues beyond employees and social responsibility. In 2023, the company conducted a materiality assessment, identifying 26 significant issues, including food safety, employee compensation, emissions management, occupational health and safety, waste management, and energy management. There is no disclosure of Board involvement in this process. Additionally, the company does not disclose board-level expertise in sustainability, food safety, or product development and innovation.

The company does not disclose executive monetary remuneration linked to climate or sustainability performance. Nor has it disclosed engaging with civil or trade associations on ESG issues, providing a comprehensive list of trade association memberships, or aligning any policy engagement activities with the goal of restricting global temperature rise to 1.5°C.

The company reports an increase in investment in R&D for clean energy and low-carbon technology, driven by changes in national policies and incentives. It also benchmarks itself against peers on ESG issues as part of its materiality assessment process.

The company does not explicitly acknowledge that protein diversification is a material business issue. Furthermore, it has not yet set a time-bound target to diversify protein sources, nor does it report revenue or sales linked to alternative protein sources.

The company reports that its subsidiary, St Hubert, offers plant-based yoghurt, ice cream, and beverages. However, it does not disclose any future growth investment plans.